Author Archives: Elaine Mulligan

Child Outcomes County Performance Report

Logo: New Jersey Department of Chlildren and Families

This sample Part C report provides bar charts for each summary statement, showing comparisons between county and state data for each of the outcomes. The report also shows percent in “e” progress category compared to state and data completeness for current and previous years, with percent difference. Published by: New Jersey Department of Children and […]

Colorado B7 Profile Sample

logo: Colorado Department of Education

This Part B report provides results, descriptive statistics, and data quality that includes 4 years’ worth of data, with comparisons to state targets and state results, and trend lines for each outcome. The report also includes developmental trajectories by progress category. Published by: Colorado Department of Education, shared with permission. View Colorado B7 Profile Sample […]

Arizona Early Intervention Program Child Outcomes Report

This sample Part C report is in the form of a spreadsheet with information including bar graphs for progress categories, outcome distributions at entry and exit, and summary statements. Instructions are available separately for how to use the spreadsheet. Published by: Arizona Early Intervention Program, shared with permission. View Arizona Sample Child Outcomes Report (Excel)

Arizona Part C COS Report Instructions

This Part C document provides instructions for viewing the sample report spreadsheet and how to use the report, including how to identify missing data. Published by Arizona Early Intervention Program, posted with permission. View Arizona Part C COS Report Instructions (MS Word)

Strengthening SSIP Evaluations with Qualitative Methods

This 2018 report provides a broad overview of what qualitative research methods are, as well as examples and suggestions for collection high-quality qualitative data. Additionally, the report offers examples of two states using qualitative methods for their SSIP evaluation. By Debra Shaver, Megan Cox, Robert A. Ruggiero, and Traci Kutaka View SSIP Evaluations with Qualitative […]

Strengthening SSIP Evaluations with Qualitative Methods

Strengthening SSIP Evaluations with Qualitative Methods offers an overview of qualitative methods that could be used for SSIP activities. The document outlines the advantages and disadvantages of focus groups, interviews and document review and recommends best practices for planning, collecting, analyzing and reporting data. Two states currently using qualitative methods as part of their SSIP […]