- Overview
- Child & Family
- Practitioner
- EIS Program/LEA
- Critical Questions
Bread and Butter Questions Aspirational Questions
3.A. EIS Program/LEA Characteristics | |
---|---|
3.A.1. What are the characteristics of local early intervention services programs and local educational agencies? | |
3.A.1.a. Where are EIS programs/LEAs located in the state (e.g., by geographic region, urban/suburban/rural/frontier)? | |
3.A.1.b. What are the characteristics of EIS programs/LEAs in the state (e.g., number of children served, number of providers in program, average funding per child)? | |
3.A.1.c. What curricula are used in the early care and education programs serving young children with disabilities? | |
3.A.1.d. What is the EI/ECSE practitioner to child ratio for each EIS program/LEA overall? By type of profession/role? | |
3.B. EIS Program/LEA Performance | |
3.B.1. How well are local early intervention services programs and local educational agencies supporting children and families? | |
3.B.1.a. How do child and family outcomes compare across EIS programs/LEAs? Are some EIS programs/LEAs meaningfully (e.g., statistically) different from the state? | |
3.B.1.b. What are the local determinations for each EIS program/LEA? | |
3.B.1.c. What percentage of EIS programs/LEAs provide IDEA services in general early care and education settings? What percentage of their children receive IDEA services in these settings? | |
3.B.1.d. Within each EIS program/LEA, what percentage of early care and education programs attended by children with IFSP/IEPs are participating in a Quality Rating and Improvement System [QRIS]? What are the ratings of those early care and education programs? | |
3.C. Funding and Expenditures | |
3.C.1. What is the cost of providing early intervention/early childhood special education (EI/ECSE) services to children and families? | |
3.C.1.a. What major funding streams and allocations support children participating in EI/ECSE (e.g., federal, state, local)? | |
3.C.1.b. What is the total amount of funding from all sources that is supporting the operation of the EI/ECSE program (including direct services, administration, general supervision, training, technical assistance, etc.)? | |
3.C.1.c. What is the cost to each local EIS program/LEA to provide EI/ECSE services? | |
3.C.1.d. What is the average cost per child for EI/ECSE services statewide? For each EIS program/LEA? | |
3.C.1.e. What are some of the factors (e.g., demographics of population, geography) that are related to differences across EIS programs/LEAs in the average cost per child? | |
3.C.2. Does the state have sufficient revenue to provide quality IDEA services? | |
3.C.2.a. What is the comparison between projected revenues/budget and estimated need at the state level (i.e., revenue gap)? | |
3.C.2.b. What is the comparison between projected revenues/budget and estimated need for each local EIS program/LEA? | |
3.C.2.c. What would it cost to provide IDEA services for young children with disabilities consistent with recommended practices and quality standards (i.e., estimated need)? | |
3.C.2.d. What is the relationship between the extent of the revenue gap and child outcomes (e.g., the percentage of children who make greater than expected growth) for each EIS program/LEA? | |
3.C.3. How can the state maximize efficiency in the operation of the early intervention/early childhood special education (EI/ECSE) program (e.g., by changing practices and reallocating resources) and maintain or improve outcomes? | |
3.C.3.a. What are the high-cost drivers within the state program configurations (e.g., personnel, evaluation, delivery of service, program models, administration)? | |
3.C.3.b. What are the characteristics of programs with relatively lower than average cost per child and relatively higher child outcomes (e.g., higher percentages of children experiencing better than expected growth)? | |
3.C.3.c. What are alternative configurations of IDEA service provision (e.g., amount and type of service, level and type of personnel) that contribute to same or better outcomes without increased cost? |